↓ Skip to main content

The Clinical Utility of the MOCA in iNPH Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Clinical Utility of the MOCA in iNPH Assessment
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2022.887669
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Wesner, Lacey Etzkorn, Shivani Bakre, Jinyu Chen, Alexander Davis, Yifan Zhang, Sevil Yasar, Aruna Rao, Mark Luciano, Jiangxia Wang, Abhay Moghekar

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 17%
Professor 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2022.
All research outputs
#13,392,948
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,099
of 12,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,825
of 441,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#173
of 746 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 746 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.