The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A dual dopaminergic therapy with L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine and chlorpromazine for the treatment of blepharospasm, a focal dystonia: Possible implications for striosomal D1 signaling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2022.922333 |
| Authors |
Shinichi Matsumoto, Hidetaka Koizumi, Hideki Shimazu, Ryuji Kaji, Satoshi Goto |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,854,210
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,429
of 11,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,034
of 431,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#196
of 803 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 803 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.