The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Clinical 3-D gait assessment of patients with polyneuropathy associated with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2022.980597 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria do Carmo Vilas-Boas, Ana Patrícia Rocha, Márcio Neves Cardoso, José Maria Fernandes, Teresa Coelho, João Paulo Silva Cunha |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#20,738,791
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#9,190
of 12,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,362
of 435,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#455
of 837 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 837 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.