↓ Skip to main content

LVIS-within-enterprise double-stent technique with coil embolization in the treatment of patients with acutely ruptured intracranial vertebrobasilar artery-dissecting aneurysms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LVIS-within-enterprise double-stent technique with coil embolization in the treatment of patients with acutely ruptured intracranial vertebrobasilar artery-dissecting aneurysms
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2023.1069380
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiaowei Wu, Yuxiao Meng, Aixia Chen, Shancai Xu, Chunlei Wang, Zhiyong Ji, Jingtao Qi, Kaikun Yuan, Jiang Shao, Huaizhang Shi, Pei Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,565,460
of 25,118,194 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,143
of 14,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,923
of 410,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#174
of 666 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,118,194 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 666 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.