↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of staged-stent and stent-assisted coiling technique for ruptured saccular wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: Safety and efficacy based on a propensity score-matched cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of staged-stent and stent-assisted coiling technique for ruptured saccular wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: Safety and efficacy based on a propensity score-matched cohort study
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2023.1101859
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guanghao Zhang, Renkun Zhang, Yanpeng Wei, Rundong Chen, Xiaoxi Zhang, Gaici Xue, Nan Lv, Guoli Duan, Chuanchuan Wang, Ying Yu, Dongwei Dai, Rui Zhao, Qiang Li, Yi Xu, Qinghai Huang, Pengfei Yang, Qiao Zuo, Jianmin Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#19,021,638
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#8,150
of 12,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,292
of 429,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#354
of 665 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 665 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.