↓ Skip to main content

The Acute Optic Neuritis Network (ACON): Study protocol of a non-interventional prospective multicenter study on diagnosis and treatment of acute optic neuritis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Acute Optic Neuritis Network (ACON): Study protocol of a non-interventional prospective multicenter study on diagnosis and treatment of acute optic neuritis
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2023.1102353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanna Asseyer, Nasrin Asgari, Jeffrey Bennett, Omer Bialer, Yolanda Blanco, Francesca Bosello, Anna Camos-Carreras, Edgar Carnero Contentti, Sara Carta, John Chen, Claudia Chien, Mashina Chomba, Russell C. Dale, Josep Dalmau, Kristina Feldmann, Eoin P. Flanagan, Caroline Froment Tilikete, Carolina Garcia-Alfonso, Joachim Havla, Mark Hellmann, Ho Jin Kim, Philipp Klyscz, Frank Konietschke, Chiara La Morgia, Marco Lana-Peixoto, Maria Isabel Leite, Netta Levin, Michael Levy, Sara Llufriu, Pablo Lopez, Itay Lotan, Alessandra Lugaresi, Romain Marignier, Sara Mariotto, Susan P. Mollan, Cassandra Ocampo, Frederike Cosima Oertel, Maja Olszewska, Jacqueline Palace, Lekha Pandit, José Luis Peralta Uribe, Sean Pittock, Sudarshini Ramanathan, Natthapon Rattanathamsakul, Albert Saiz, Sara Samadzadeh, Bernardo Sanchez-Dalmau, Deanna Saylor, Michael Scheel, Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch, Jemal Shifa, Sasitorn Siritho, Pia S. Sperber, Prem S. Subramanian, Alon Tiosano, Adi Vaknin-Dembinsky, Alvaro Jose Mejia Vergara, Adi Wilf-Yarkoni, Luis Alfonso Zarco, Hanna G. Zimmermann, Friedemann Paul, Hadas Stiebel-Kalish

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 11 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Unspecified 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,715,201
of 26,563,001 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,391
of 15,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,526
of 433,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#37
of 688 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 688 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.