The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of e-ASPECTS software on the performance of physicians compared to a consensus ground truth: a multi-reader, multi-case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2023.1221255 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hassan Kobeissi, David F. Kallmes, John Benson, Alex Nagelschneider, Ajay Madhavan, Steven A. Messina, Kara Schwartz, Norbert Campeau, Carrie M. Carr, Deena M. Nasr, Sherri Braksick, Eugene L. Scharf, James Klaas, Zoe Victoria Joan Woodhead, George Harston, James Briggs, Olivier Joly, Stephen Gerry, Anna L. Kuhn, Angelos A. Kostas, Kambiz Nael, Mohamad AbdalKader, Ramanathan Kadirvel, Waleed Brinjikji |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,138,355
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#984
of 14,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,728
of 354,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#19
of 586 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 586 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.