↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture for poststroke dysphagia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture for poststroke dysphagia
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2023.1270624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuezheng Li, Lijun Lu, Xuefeng Fu, Hao Li, Wen Yang, Hua Guo, Kaifeng Guo, Zhen Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#22,353,670
of 24,946,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#10,257
of 14,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,256
of 170,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#122
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,946,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.