The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case report: Clinically mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion: an autopsy case
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2023.1322302 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maho Hayashi, Midori Ueda, Koji Hayashi, Ei Kawahara, Shin-ichiro Azuma, Asuka Suzuki, Yuka Nakaya, Rei Asano, Mamiko Sato, Toyoaki Miura, Hiromi Hayashi, Kouji Hayashi, Yasutaka Kobayashi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,640,660
of 26,230,991 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,821
of 14,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,462
of 375,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#173
of 596 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,230,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 596 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.