↓ Skip to main content

Early re-emerging tremor after MRgFUS thalamotomy: case–control analysis of procedural and imaging features

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early re-emerging tremor after MRgFUS thalamotomy: case–control analysis of procedural and imaging features
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2024.1356613
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federico Bruno, Pierfrancesco Badini, Antonio Innocenzi, Gennaro Saporito, Alessia Catalucci, Patrizia Sucapane, Antonio Barile, Ernesto Di Cesare, Carmine Marini, Francesca Pistoia, Alessandra Splendiani

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,014,581
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,555
of 14,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,853
of 187,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#21
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.