The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case report: Insulinoma masquerades as epilepsy – quantitative EEG analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2024.1371055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalia Kostolanska, Petr Klimes, Jitka Kocvarova, Hana Pikulova, Ondrej Strycek, Milan Brazdil, Irena Dolezalova |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,687,135
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,253
of 14,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,949
of 181,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#49
of 312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.