The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Safety and efficacy of magnesium-rich artificial cerebrospinal fluid for subarachnoid hemorrhage
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2024.1376216 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yawen Cheng, Xiangning Han, Wanfu Xie, Gaofeng Xu, Xiaobin Bai, Lei Qi, Linjuan Zhang, Rui Liu, Weihua Dong, Weiyi Feng, Chengsen Pang, Wei Zhang, Fude Liu, Xiangqi Cao, Yue Xu, Guogang Luo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,975,624
of 26,303,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#8,054
of 14,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,854
of 348,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#148
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,303,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.