The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long-term efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of apitegromab in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: results from the 36-month TOPAZ study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2024.1419791 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas O. Crawford, John W. Day, Darryl C. De Vivo, Jena M. Krueger, Eugenio Mercuri, Andres Nascimento, Amy Pasternak, Elena Stacy Mazzone, Tina Duong, Guochen Song, Jing L. Marantz, Scott Baver, Dongzi Yu, Lan Liu, Basil T. Darras |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,826,499
of 26,436,676 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#2,864
of 15,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,083
of 185,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#8
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,436,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.