The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Automated identification of thrombectomy amenable vessel occlusion on computed tomography angiography using deep learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2024.1442025 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jung Hoon Han, Sue Young Ha, Hoyeon Lee, Gi-Hun Park, Hotak Hong, Dongmin Kim, Jae Guk Kim, Joon-Tae Kim, Leonard Sunwoo, Chi Kyung Kim, Wi-Sun Ryu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2024.
All research outputs
#20,884,635
of 26,530,858 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#8,629
of 15,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,647
of 233,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#92
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,530,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.