↓ Skip to main content

Dopaminergic control of attentional flexibility: inhibition of return is associated with the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dopaminergic control of attentional flexibility: inhibition of return is associated with the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1)
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenza S Colzato, Jay Pratt, Bernhard Hommel

Abstract

Genetic variability related to the dopamine (DA) transporter gene (DAT1) has received increasing attention as a possible modulator of human cognition. The 9-repeat allele of the DAT1 gene is presumably associated with higher striatal DA levels than the 10-repeat allele, which might support inhibitory control functions. We investigated the impact of the DAT1 gene on the inhibition of return (IOR) effect, which refers to the fact that people are slower to detect a target if it appears in a previously attended location. 140 healthy adults, genotyped for the DAT1 gene, performed an IOR task with stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOAs) between attention cue and target of 150-1200 ms. Nine-repeat carriers showed more pronounced IOR effect than 10/10 homozygous at short SOAs but both groups of subjects eventually reached the same magnitude of IOR. Our findings support the idea that striatal DA levels promote IOR, presumably by biasing the interplay between prefrontal and striatal networks towards greater cognitive flexibility.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 27%
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 51%
Neuroscience 13 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2010.
All research outputs
#20,142,242
of 22,647,730 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,506
of 7,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,497
of 163,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#63
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,647,730 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.