↓ Skip to main content

What have We Learned from “Perturbing” the Human Cortical Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
310 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What have We Learned from “Perturbing” the Human Cortical Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe A. Chouinard, Tomáš Paus

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Germany 7 2%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 283 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 25%
Researcher 54 17%
Student > Master 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 5%
Other 63 20%
Unknown 38 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 22%
Neuroscience 51 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 14%
Engineering 15 5%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 54 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,614
of 7,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,637
of 178,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#36
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.