↓ Skip to main content

What do We Gain from Gamma? Local Dynamic Gain Modulation Drives Enhanced Efficacy and Efficiency of Signal Transmission

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What do We Gain from Gamma? Local Dynamic Gain Modulation Drives Enhanced Efficacy and Efficiency of Signal Transmission
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00185
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulf Knoblich, Joshua H. Siegle, Dominique L. Pritchett, Christopher I. Moore

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 36%
France 2 18%
United Kingdom 2 18%
Brazil 1 9%
Estonia 1 9%
Germany 1 9%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 327%
Researcher 23 209%
Student > Master 9 82%
Student > Bachelor 9 82%
Professor 8 73%
Other 17 155%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 382%
Neuroscience 20 182%
Psychology 10 91%
Engineering 6 55%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 55%
Other 13 118%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#23,516,639
of 26,183,699 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#7,040
of 7,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,625
of 177,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#65
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,183,699 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.