↓ Skip to main content

Selective Theta-Synchronization of Choice-Relevant Information Subserves Goal-Directed Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selective Theta-Synchronization of Choice-Relevant Information Subserves Goal-Directed Behavior
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00210
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thilo Womelsdorf, Martin Vinck, L. Stan Leung, Stefan Everling

Abstract

Theta activity reflects a state of rhythmic modulation of excitability at the level of single neuron membranes, within local neuronal groups and between distant nodes of a neuronal network. A wealth of evidence has shown that during theta states distant neuronal groups synchronize, forming networks of spatially confined neuronal clusters at specific time periods during task performance. Here, we show that a functional commonality of networks engaging in theta rhythmic states is that they emerge around decision points, reflecting rhythmic synchronization of choice-relevant information. Decision points characterize a point in time shortly before a subject chooses to select one action over another, i.e., when automatic behavior is terminated and the organism reactivates multiple sources of information to evaluate the evidence for available choices. As such, decision processes require the coordinated retrieval of choice-relevant information including (i) the retrieval of stimulus evaluations (stimulus-reward associations) and reward expectancies about future outcomes, (ii) the retrieval of past and prospective memories (e.g., stimulus-stimulus associations), (iii) the reactivation of contextual task rule representations (e.g., stimulus-response mappings), along with (iv) an ongoing assessment of sensory evidence. An increasing number of studies reveal that retrieval of these multiple types of information proceeds within few theta cycles through synchronized spiking activity across limbic, striatal, and cortical processing nodes. The outlined evidence suggests that evolving spatially and temporally specific theta synchronization could serve as the critical correlate underlying the selection of a choice during goal-directed behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 4 1%
Canada 4 1%
France 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 245 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 26%
Researcher 64 24%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 39 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 19%
Neuroscience 47 17%
Computer Science 12 4%
Engineering 10 4%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 62 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,168,910
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,581
of 7,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,612
of 163,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#41
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.