↓ Skip to main content

Obesity-Related Differences between Women and Men in Brain Structure and Goal-Directed Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obesity-Related Differences between Women and Men in Brain Structure and Goal-Directed Behavior
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette Horstmann, Franziska P. Busse, David Mathar, Karsten Müller, Jöran Lepsien, Haiko Schlögl, Stefan Kabisch, Jürgen Kratzsch, Jane Neumann, Michael Stumvoll, Arno Villringer, Burkhard Pleger

Abstract

Gender differences in the regulation of body-weight are well documented. Here, we assessed obesity-related influences of gender on brain structure as well as performance in the Iowa Gambling Task. This task requires evaluation of both immediate rewards and long-term outcomes and thus mirrors the trade-off between immediate reward from eating and the long-term effect of overeating on body-weight. In women, but not in men, we show that the preference for salient immediate rewards in the face of negative long-term consequences is higher in obese than in lean subjects. In addition, we report structural differences in the left dorsal striatum (i.e., putamen) and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for women only. Functionally, both regions are known to play complimentary roles in habitual and goal-directed control of behavior in motivational contexts. For women as well as men, gray matter volume correlates positively with measures of obesity in regions coding the value and saliency of food (i.e., nucleus accumbens, orbitofrontal cortex) as well as in the hypothalamus (i.e., the brain's central homeostatic center). These differences between lean and obese subjects in hedonic and homeostatic control systems may reflect a bias in eating behavior toward energy-intake exceeding the actual homeostatic demand. Although we cannot infer from our results the etiology of the observed structural differences, our results resemble neural and behavioral differences well known from other forms of addiction, however, with marked differences between women and men. These findings are important for designing gender-appropriate treatments of obesity and possibly its recognition as a form of addiction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 240 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 22%
Researcher 42 17%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 41 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 25%
Neuroscience 34 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 11%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 57 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,891,239
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#885
of 7,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,337
of 193,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#17
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.