↓ Skip to main content

Cortical Microcircuit Dynamics Mediating Binocular Rivalry: The Role of Adaptation in Inhibition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cortical Microcircuit Dynamics Mediating Binocular Rivalry: The Role of Adaptation in Inhibition
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panagiota Theodoni, Theofanis I. Panagiotaropoulos, Vishal Kapoor, Nikos K. Logothetis, Gustavo Deco

Abstract

Perceptual bistability arises when two conflicting interpretations of an ambiguous stimulus or images in binocular rivalry (BR) compete for perceptual dominance. From a computational point of view, competition models based on cross-inhibition and adaptation have shown that noise is a crucial force for rivalry, and operates in balance with adaptation. In particular, noise-driven transitions and adaptation-driven oscillations define two dynamical regimes and the system explains the observed alternations in perception when it operates near their boundary. In order to gain insights into the microcircuit dynamics mediating spontaneous perceptual alternations, we used a reduced recurrent attractor-based biophysically realistic spiking network, well known for working memory, attention, and decision making, where a spike-frequency adaptation mechanism is implemented to account for perceptual bistability. We thus derived a consistently reduced four-variable population rate model using mean-field techniques, and we tested it on BR data collected from human subjects. Our model accounts for experimental data parameters such as mean time dominance, coefficient of variation, and gamma distribution fit. In addition, we show that our model operates near the bifurcation that separates the noise-driven transitions regime from the adaptation-driven oscillations regime, and agrees with Levelt's second revised and fourth propositions. These results demonstrate for the first time that a consistent reduction of a biophysically realistic spiking network of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with spike-frequency adaptation could account for BR. Moreover, we demonstrate that BR can be explained only through the dynamics of competing neuronal pools, without taking into account the adaptation of inhibitory interneurons. However, the adaptation of interneurons affects the optimal parametric space of the system by decreasing the overall adaptation necessary for the bifurcation to occur, and introduces oscillations in the spontaneous state.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Netherlands 2 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belarus 1 1%
China 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 67 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 20%
Neuroscience 16 20%
Psychology 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,249,959
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,254
of 7,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,077
of 180,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#79
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.