↓ Skip to main content

Searching for Roots of Entrainment and Joint Action in Early Musical Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Searching for Roots of Entrainment and Joint Action in Early Musical Interactions
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Phillips-Silver, Peter E. Keller

Abstract

When people play music and dance together, they engage in forms of musical joint action that are often characterized by a shared sense of rhythmic timing and affective state (i.e., temporal and affective entrainment). In order to understand the origins of musical joint action, we propose a model in which entrainment is linked to dual mechanisms (motor resonance and action simulation), which in turn support musical behavior (imitation and complementary joint action). To illustrate this model, we consider two generic forms of joint musical behavior: chorusing and turn-taking. We explore how these common behaviors can be founded on entrainment capacities established early in human development, specifically during musical interactions between infants and their caregivers. If the roots of entrainment are found in early musical interactions which are practiced from childhood into adulthood, then we propose that the rehearsal of advanced musical ensemble skills can be considered to be a refined, mimetic form of temporal and affective entrainment whose evolution begins in infancy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 267 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 23%
Researcher 54 19%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Professor 15 5%
Other 60 21%
Unknown 31 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 113 40%
Arts and Humanities 32 11%
Neuroscience 19 7%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 44 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,190,445
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,454
of 7,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,347
of 254,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#80
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.