↓ Skip to main content

Training the developing brain: a neurocognitive perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
399 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Training the developing brain: a neurocognitive perspective
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dietsje D. Jolles, Eveline A. Crone

Abstract

DEVELOPMENTAL TRAINING STUDIES ARE IMPORTANT TO INCREASE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE POTENTIAL OF THE DEVELOPING BRAIN BY PROVIDING ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS SUCH AS: "Which functions can and which functions cannot be improved as a result of practice?," "Is there a specific period during which training has more impact?," and "Is it always advantageous to train a particular function?"In addition, neuroimaging methods provide valuable information about the underlying mechanisms that drive cognitive plasticity. In this review, we describe how neuroscientific studies of training effects inform us about the possibilities of the developing brain, pointing out that childhood is a special period during which training may have different effects. We conclude that there is much complexity in interpreting training effects in children. Depending on the type of training and the level of maturation of the individual, training may influence developmental trajectories in different ways. We propose that the immature brain structure might set limits on how much can be achieved with training, but that the immaturity can also have advantages, in terms of flexibility for learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Netherlands 4 1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 369 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 21%
Researcher 66 17%
Student > Master 58 15%
Student > Bachelor 36 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 83 21%
Unknown 45 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 178 45%
Social Sciences 30 8%
Neuroscience 27 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 5%
Other 52 13%
Unknown 72 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,465,380
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#732
of 7,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,779
of 244,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#45
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.