↓ Skip to main content

Multi-voxel pattern analysis in human hippocampal subfields

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-voxel pattern analysis in human hippocampal subfields
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heidi M. Bonnici, Martin J. Chadwick, Dharshan Kumaran, Demis Hassabis, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Eleanor A. Maguire

Abstract

A complete understanding of the hippocampus depends on elucidating the representations and computations that exist in its anatomically distinct subfields. High-resolution structural and functional MRI scanning is starting to permit insights into hippocampal subfields in humans. In parallel, such scanning has facilitated the use of multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) to examine information present in the distributed pattern of activity across voxels. The aim of this study was to combine these two relatively new innovations and deploy MVPA in the hippocampal subfields. Delineating subregions of the human hippocampus, a prerequisite for our study, remains a significant challenge, with extant methods often only examining part of the hippocampus, or being unable to differentiate CA3 and dentate gyrus (DG). We therefore devised a new high-resolution anatomical scanning and subfield segmentation protocol that allowed us to overcome these issues, and separately identify CA1, CA3, DG, and subiculum (SUB) across the whole hippocampus using a standard 3T MRI scanner. We then used MVPA to examine fMRI data associated with a decision-making paradigm involving highly similar scenes that had relevance for the computations that occur in hippocampal subfields. Intra- and inter-rater scores for subfield identification using our procedure confirmed its reliability. Moreover, we found that decoding of information within hippocampal subfields was possible using MVPA, with findings that included differential effects for CA3 and DG. We suggest that MVPA in human hippocampal subfields may open up new opportunities to examine how different types of information are represented and processed at this fundamental level.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 3%
United States 4 2%
Netherlands 3 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 217 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 23%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 48 20%
Unknown 21 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 33%
Neuroscience 49 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 11%
Computer Science 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 42 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,843,007
of 26,452,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,544
of 7,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,785
of 254,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#119
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,452,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.