↓ Skip to main content

Informational connectivity: identifying synchronized discriminability of multi-voxel patterns across the brain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Informational connectivity: identifying synchronized discriminability of multi-voxel patterns across the brain
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc N. Coutanche, Sharon L. Thompson-Schill

Abstract

The fluctuations in a brain region's activation levels over a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time-course are used in functional connectivity (FC) to identify networks with synchronous responses. It is increasingly recognized that multi-voxel activity patterns contain information that cannot be extracted from univariate activation levels. Here we present a novel analysis method that quantifies regions' synchrony in multi-voxel activity pattern discriminability, rather than univariate activation, across a timeseries. We introduce a measure of multi-voxel pattern discriminability at each time-point, which is then used to identify regions that share synchronous time-courses of condition-specific multi-voxel information. This method has the sensitivity and access to distributed information that multi-voxel pattern analysis enjoys, allowing it to be applied to data from conditions not separable by univariate responses. We demonstrate this by analyzing data collected while people viewed four different types of man-made objects (typically not separable by univariate analyses) using both FC and informational connectivity (IC) methods. IC reveals networks of object-processing regions that are not detectable using FC. The IC results support prior findings and hypotheses about object processing. This new method allows investigators to ask questions that are not addressable through typical FC, just as multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) has added new research avenues to those addressable with the general linear model (GLM).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 8%
Netherlands 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 186 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 33%
Researcher 47 22%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 27 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 89 42%
Neuroscience 38 18%
Engineering 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 37 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,299,237
of 23,931,731 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,001
of 7,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,649
of 286,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#411
of 861 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,931,731 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 861 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.