↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of brain-computer interface aptitude from individual brain structure

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prediction of brain-computer interface aptitude from individual brain structure
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00105
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Halder, B. Varkuti, M. Bogdan, A. Kübler, W. Rosenstiel, R. Sitaram, N. Birbaumer

Abstract

Objective: Brain-computer interface (BCI) provide a non-muscular communication channel for patients with impairments of the motor system. A significant number of BCI users is unable to obtain voluntary control of a BCI-system in proper time. This makes methods that can be used to determine the aptitude of a user necessary. Methods: We hypothesized that integrity and connectivity of involved white matter connections may serve as a predictor of individual BCI-performance. Therefore, we analyzed structural data from anatomical scans and DTI of motor imagery BCI-users differentiated into high and low BCI-aptitude groups based on their overall performance. Results: Using a machine learning classification method we identified discriminating structural brain trait features and correlated the best features with a continuous measure of individual BCI-performance. Prediction of the aptitude group of each participant was possible with near perfect accuracy (one error). Conclusions: Tissue volumetric analysis yielded only poor classification results. In contrast, the structural integrity and myelination quality of deep white matter structures such as the Corpus Callosum, Cingulum, and Superior Fronto-Occipital Fascicle were positively correlated with individual BCI-performance. Significance: This confirms that structural brain traits contribute to individual performance in BCI use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 143 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 30 20%
Psychology 22 15%
Engineering 20 13%
Computer Science 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 39 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,074,925
of 24,072,790 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,976
of 7,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,977
of 288,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#530
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,072,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.