↓ Skip to main content

Relationships among cognition, emotion, and motivation: implications for intervention and neuroplasticity in psychopathology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationships among cognition, emotion, and motivation: implications for intervention and neuroplasticity in psychopathology
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00261
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura D. Crocker, Wendy Heller, Stacie L. Warren, Aminda J. O'Hare, Zachary P. Infantolino, Gregory A. Miller

Abstract

Emotion-cognition and motivation-cognition relationships and related brain mechanisms are receiving increasing attention in the clinical research literature as a means of understanding diverse types of psychopathology and improving biological and psychological treatments. This paper reviews and integrates some of the growing evidence for cognitive biases and deficits in depression and anxiety, how these disruptions interact with emotional and motivational processes, and what brain mechanisms appear to be involved. This integration sets the stage for understanding the role of neuroplasticity in implementing change in cognitive, emotional, and motivational processes in psychopathology as a function of intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 369 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 18%
Student > Master 59 15%
Student > Bachelor 46 12%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 71 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 172 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 7%
Neuroscience 18 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Other 59 15%
Unknown 80 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,530,073
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,660
of 7,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,401
of 280,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#264
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.