↓ Skip to main content

Nucleus accumbens response to gains in reputation for the self relative to gains for others predicts social media use

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 7,811)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
57 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
112 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Nucleus accumbens response to gains in reputation for the self relative to gains for others predicts social media use
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00439
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dar Meshi, Carmen Morawetz, Hauke R. Heekeren

Abstract

Our reputation is important to us; we've experienced natural selection to care about our reputation. Recently, the neural processing of gains in reputation (positive social feedback concerning one's character) has been shown to occur in the human ventral striatum. It is still unclear, however, how individual differences in the processing of gains in reputation may lead to individual differences in real-world behavior. For example, in the real-world, one way that people currently maintain their reputation is by using social media websites, like Facebook. Furthermore, Facebook use consists of a social comparison component, where users observe others' behavior and can compare it to their own. Therefore, we hypothesized a relationship between the way the brain processes specifically self-relevant gains in reputation and one's degree of Facebook use. We recorded functional neuroimaging data while participants received gains in reputation, observed the gains in reputation of another person, or received monetary reward. We demonstrate that across participants, when responding to gains in reputation for the self, relative to observing gains for others, reward-related activity in the left nucleus accumbens predicts Facebook use. However, nucleus accumbens activity in response to monetary reward did not predict Facebook use. Finally, a control step-wise regression analysis showed that Facebook use primarily explains our results in the nucleus accumbens. Overall, our results demonstrate how individual sensitivity of the nucleus accumbens to the receipt of self-relevant social information leads to differences in real-world behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 318 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 19%
Student > Bachelor 55 17%
Researcher 46 14%
Student > Master 36 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 59 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 130 39%
Neuroscience 29 9%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 75 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 604. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#39,642
of 26,246,850 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#26
of 7,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174
of 293,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,246,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.