The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A neural disconnection hypothesis on impaired numerical processing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00663 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elise Klein, Korbinian Moeller, Klaus Willmes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 27% |
| Researcher | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 49% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#13,045,986
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,782
of 7,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,576
of 280,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#520
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.