The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heterogeneity within Autism Spectrum Disorders: What have We Learned from Neuroimaging Studies?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00733 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rhoshel K. Lenroot, Pui Ka Yeung |
| Abstract |
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) display significant heterogeneity. Although most neuroimaging studies in ASD have been designed to identify commonalities among affected individuals, rather than differences, some studies have explored variation within ASD. There have been two general types of approaches used for this in the neuroimaging literature to date: comparison of subgroups within ASD, and analyses using dimensional measures to link clinical variation to brain differences. This review focuses on structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies that have used these approaches to begin to explore heterogeneity between individuals with ASD. Although this type of data is yet sparse, recognition is growing of the limitations of behaviorally defined categorical diagnoses for understanding neurobiology. Study designs that are more informative regarding the sources of heterogeneity in ASD have the potential to improve our understanding of the neurobiological processes underlying ASD. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 291 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 22% |
| Researcher | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 15% |
| Unknown | 62 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 77 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 43 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 15% |
| Unknown | 90 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,762,516
of 26,458,381 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,257
of 7,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,723
of 294,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#203
of 861 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,458,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 861 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.