↓ Skip to main content

Mathematical learning difficulties subtypes classification

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mathematical learning difficulties subtypes classification
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giannis Karagiannakis, Anna Baccaglini-Frank, Yiannis Papadatos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 232 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 11%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 65 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 22%
Social Sciences 37 16%
Mathematics 27 11%
Computer Science 12 5%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 76 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,668,050
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,351
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,622
of 305,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#37
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.