The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methodological considerations for the neurophenomenology of dreaming: commentary on Windt's “Reporting dream experience”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00317 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizaveta Solomonova, Kieran C. R. Fox, Tore Nielsen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 22% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 19% |
| Philosophy | 4 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,716,885
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,354
of 7,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,671
of 226,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#113
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.