The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mirror neuron activity is no proof for action understanding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00333 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alina Steinhorst, Joachim Funke |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Professor | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 57 | 52% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,171,964
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,204
of 7,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,783
of 241,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#131
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.