↓ Skip to main content

Do we need a theory-based assessment of consciousness in the field of disorders of consciousness?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do we need a theory-based assessment of consciousness in the field of disorders of consciousness?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00402
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander A. Fingelkurts, Andrew A. Fingelkurts, Sergio Bagnato, Cristina Boccagni, Giuseppe Galardi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Professor 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 22%
Psychology 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Computer Science 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,041,460
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,898
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,320
of 228,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#92
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.