↓ Skip to main content

Discrimination of fearful and happy body postures in 8-month-old infants: an event-related potential study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discrimination of fearful and happy body postures in 8-month-old infants: an event-related potential study
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00531
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuela Missana, Purva Rajhans, Anthony P. Atkinson, Tobias Grossmann

Abstract

Responding to others' emotional body expressions is an essential social skill in humans. Adults readily detect emotions from body postures, but it is unclear whether infants are sensitive to emotional body postures. We examined 8-month-old infants' brain responses to emotional body postures by measuring event-related potentials (ERPs) to happy and fearful bodies. Our results revealed two emotion-sensitive ERP components: body postures evoked an early N290 at occipital electrodes and a later Nc at fronto-central electrodes that were enhanced in response to fearful (relative to happy) expressions. These findings demonstrate that: (a) 8-month-old infants discriminate between static emotional body postures; and (b) similar to infant emotional face perception, the sensitivity to emotional body postures is reflected in early perceptual (N290) and later attentional (Nc) neural processes. This provides evidence for an early developmental emergence of the neural processes involved in the discrimination of emotional body postures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 64 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 27%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 59%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#13,917,976
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,301
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,880
of 228,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#162
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.