↓ Skip to main content

Simulated rich club lesioning in brain networks: a scaffold for communication and integration?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simulated rich club lesioning in brain networks: a scaffold for communication and integration?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00647
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel A. de Reus, Martijn P. van den Heuvel

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 26%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 29 27%
Psychology 14 13%
Engineering 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,138,842
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,997
of 7,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,984
of 237,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#119
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.