↓ Skip to main content

Delayed convergence between brain network structure and function in rolandic epilepsy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delayed convergence between brain network structure and function in rolandic epilepsy
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00704
Pubmed ID
Authors

René M. H. Besseling, Jacobus F. A. Jansen, Geke M. Overvliet, Sylvie J. M. van der Kruijs, Saskia C. M. Ebus, Anton J. A. de Louw, Paul A. M. Hofman, Albert P. Aldenkamp, Walter H. Backes

Abstract

Rolandic epilepsy (RE) manifests during a critical phase of brain development, and has been associated with language impairments. Concordant abnormalities in structural and functional connectivity (SC and FC) have been described before. As SC and FC are under mutual influence, the current study investigates abnormalities in the SC-FC synergy in RE.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Neuroscience 16 18%
Psychology 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2014.
All research outputs
#13,919,373
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,302
of 7,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,205
of 238,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#168
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.