↓ Skip to main content

Stepping to phase-perturbed metronome cues: multisensory advantage in movement synchrony but not correction

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stepping to phase-perturbed metronome cues: multisensory advantage in movement synchrony but not correction
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00724
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel L. Wright, Laura C. Spurgeon, Mark T. Elliott

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 29%
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 24%
Neuroscience 9 13%
Engineering 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Computer Science 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,281,199
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,629
of 7,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,403
of 239,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#122
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.