The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cortex Integrity Relevance in Muscle Synergies in Severe Chronic Stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00744 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eliana García-Cossio, Doris Broetz, Niels Birbaumer, Ander Ramos-Murguialday |
| Abstract |
Recent experimental evidence has indicated that the motor system coordinates muscle activations through a linear combination of muscle synergies that are specified at the spinal or brainstem networks level. After stroke upper limb impairment is characterized by abnormal patterns of muscle activations or synergies. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,415,092
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,065
of 7,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,074
of 251,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#164
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.