The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diffusion-Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hand and Foot Fibers Location at the Corona Radiata: Comparison with Two Lesion Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00752 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dong-Hoon Lee, Cheolpyo Hong, Bong-Soo Han |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 24% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,620,351
of 23,596,168 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,026
of 7,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,144
of 253,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#98
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,596,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.