The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What learning theories can teach us in designing neurofeedback treatments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00894 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ute Strehl |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Libya | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 264 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Researcher | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 85 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 46 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 7% |
| Engineering | 16 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#511,539
of 26,007,325 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#227
of 7,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,309
of 277,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#9
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,007,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.