↓ Skip to main content

Brain stimulation for treatment and enhancement in children: an ethical analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
133 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain stimulation for treatment and enhancement in children: an ethical analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00953
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Maslen, Brian D. Earp, Roi Cohen Kadosh, Julian Savulescu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 90 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Psychology 19 20%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Philosophy 6 6%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 24 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#425,816
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#178
of 7,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,702
of 364,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.