↓ Skip to main content

Insights from the supplementary motor area syndrome in balancing movement initiation and inhibition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insights from the supplementary motor area syndrome in balancing movement initiation and inhibition
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00960
Pubmed ID
Authors

A R E Potgieser, B M de Jong, M Wagemakers, E W Hoving, R J M Groen

Abstract

The supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome is a characteristic neurosurgical syndrome that can occur after unilateral resection of the SMA. Clinical symptoms may vary from none to a global akinesia, predominantly on the contralateral side, with preserved muscle strength and mutism. A remarkable feature is that these symptoms completely resolve within weeks to months, leaving only a disturbance in alternating bimanual movements. In this review we give an overview of the old and new insights from the SMA syndrome and extrapolate these findings to seemingly unrelated diseases and symptoms such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and tics. Furthermore, we integrate findings from lesion, stimulation and functional imaging studies to provide insight in the motor function of the SMA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 147 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Other 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Other 40 26%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 26%
Neuroscience 36 24%
Psychology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 37 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,683,641
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,657
of 7,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,252
of 365,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#140
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.