The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Action verbs are processed differently in metaphorical and literal sentences depending on the semantic match of visual primes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00982 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Melissa Troyer, Lauren B. Curley, Luke E. Miller, Ayse P. Saygin, Benjamin K. Bergen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 27% |
Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 16 | 25% |
Linguistics | 12 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 10% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,367,274
of 26,552,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,947
of 7,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,242
of 372,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#116
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,552,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.