You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An eye-tracking method to reveal the link between gazing patterns and pragmatic abilities in high functioning autism spectrum disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01067 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ouriel Grynszpan, Jacqueline Nadel |
| Abstract |
The present study illustrates the potential advantages of an eye-tracking method for exploring the association between visual scanning of faces and inferences of mental states. Participants watched short videos involving social interactions and had to explain what they had seen. The number of cognition verbs (e.g., think, believe, know) in their answers were counted. Given the possible use of peripheral vision that could confound eye-tracking measures, we added a condition using a gaze-contingent viewing window: the entire visual display is blurred, expect for an area that moves with the participant's gaze. Eleven typical adults and eleven high functioning adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) were recruited. The condition employing the viewing window yielded strong correlations between the average duration of fixations, the ratio of cognition verbs and standard measures of social disabilities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,325,572
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,262
of 7,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,754
of 353,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#130
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.