The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a “natural” grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00216 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert L. Whitwell, Tzvi Ganel, Caitlin M. Byrne, Melvyn A. Goodale |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 13% |
| Engineering | 7 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,873,023
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,623
of 7,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,496
of 282,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#140
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.