Title |
Cultural differences in on-line sensitivity to emotional voices: comparing East and West
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00311 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pan Liu, Simon Rigoulot, Marc D. Pell |
Abstract |
Evidence that culture modulates on-line neural responses to the emotional meanings encoded by vocal and facial expressions was demonstrated recently in a study comparing English North Americans and Chinese (Liu et al., 2015). Here, we compared how individuals from these two cultures passively respond to emotional cues from faces and voices using an Oddball task. Participants viewed in-group emotional faces, with or without simultaneous vocal expressions, while performing a face-irrelevant visual task as the EEG was recorded. A significantly larger visual Mismatch Negativity (vMMN) was observed for Chinese vs. English participants when faces were accompanied by voices, suggesting that Chinese were influenced to a larger extent by task-irrelevant vocal cues. These data highlight further differences in how adults from East Asian vs. Western cultures process socio-emotional cues, arguing that distinct cultural practices in communication (e.g., display rules) shape neurocognitive activity associated with the early perception and integration of multi-sensory emotional cues. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
Spain | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hungary | 1 | 1% |
Philippines | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 29% |
Researcher | 12 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 20% |
Unknown | 16 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 31 | 38% |
Linguistics | 8 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 24% |