You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deployment of spatial attention without moving the eyes is boosted by oculomotor adaptation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00426 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ouazna Habchi, Elodie Rey, Romain Mathieu, Christian Urquizar, Alessandro Farnè, Denis Pélisson |
| Abstract |
Vertebrates developed sophisticated solutions to select environmental visual information, being capable of moving attention without moving the eyes. A large body of behavioral and neuroimaging studies indicate a tight coupling between eye movements and spatial attention. The nature of this link, however, remains highly debated. Here, we demonstrate that deployment of human covert attention, measured in stationary eye conditions, can be boosted across space by changing the size of ocular saccades to a single position via a specific adaptation paradigm. These findings indicate that spatial attention is more widely affected by oculomotor plasticity than previously thought. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 52% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#14,232,642
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,584
of 7,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,074
of 264,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#79
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.