The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: GRETNA: a graph theoretical network analysis toolbox for imaging connectomics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00458 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jinhui Wang, Xindi Wang, Mingrui Xia, Xuhong Liao, Alan Evans, Yong He |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | <1% |
Researcher | 2 | <1% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 211 | 98% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Psychology | 1 | <1% |
Neuroscience | 1 | <1% |
Engineering | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 212 | 98% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,566,010
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,587
of 7,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,004
of 266,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#114
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.