↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: The safety and efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation in development and neurodevelopmental disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: The safety and efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation in development and neurodevelopmental disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00544
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsay M. Oberman, Peter G. Enticott

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 13 27%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Engineering 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,390,329
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,468
of 7,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,800
of 281,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#43
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.