Title |
How previous experience shapes perception in different sensory modalities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00594 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joel S. Snyder, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik, A. Davi Vitela, Lucia Melloni |
Abstract |
What has transpired immediately before has a strong influence on how sensory stimuli are processed and perceived. In particular, temporal context can have contrastive effects, repelling perception away from the interpretation of the context stimulus, and attractive effects (TCEs), whereby perception repeats upon successive presentations of the same stimulus. For decades, scientists have documented contrastive and attractive temporal context effects mostly with simple visual stimuli. But both types of effects also occur in other modalities, e.g., audition and touch, and for stimuli of varying complexity, raising the possibility that context effects reflect general computational principles of sensory systems. Neuroimaging shows that contrastive and attractive context effects arise from neural processes in different areas of the cerebral cortex, suggesting two separate operations with distinct functional roles. Bayesian models can provide a functional account of both context effects, whereby prior experience adjusts sensory systems to optimize perception of future stimuli. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 50% |
United States | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 25% |
Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
Researcher | 11 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 11% |
Unknown | 42 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 26 | 18% |
Neuroscience | 23 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
Other | 27 | 19% |
Unknown | 50 | 35% |